falomaven.blogg.se

Adobe flash player 10.1 windows 7 google chrome
Adobe flash player 10.1 windows 7 google chrome






On top of that, your existing FP10 project would likely need a substantial code rewrite. Flash Lite 3 is written entirely in ActionScript 2 which provides inferior performance, convoluted language composition, and conventions that promote bad programming style.There is little to no downside to targeting Flash Lite 3 right now in that Flash Player 10.1 should have no trouble playing back content built in that way.Will Flash Player 10.1 offer the same feature set such as being able to browse files on a mobile and upload to the web? Or do I not need to optimise at all - will Flash Player 10.1 deliver the same experience on a mobile browser? I will still want to optimise my Flash 10 for web application to run on Flash Player 10.1 to make it perform better on a mobile browser so this is still potentially just as much work as building a standalone Flash Lite 3 app. Is it valid to say that the majority of handsets out there now support Flash Lite 3 and may not support Flash Player 10.1 or will all handsets be able to use Flash Player 10.1 when it comes out? What share of the market will this release affect? I guess I could have my flash lite 3 app out there in a couple of months by which time Flash Player 10.1 will be coming very soon. I am about to start developing an flash based application for mobile phones, should I look at using FLash Lite 3 or wait until Flash Player 10.1 comes out.

adobe flash player 10.1 windows 7 google chrome adobe flash player 10.1 windows 7 google chrome

Adobe are launching Flash Player 10.1 in the first quarter of 2010, this will provide consistent runtime across desktops and mobile devices (so I assume if it was built for the web it will work on the mobile).








Adobe flash player 10.1 windows 7 google chrome